Sesquiterpenes and Monoterpenes from the Leaves and Stems of Illicium simonsii and Their Antibacterial Activity

Two undescribed ether derivatives of sesquiterpenes, 1-ethoxycaryolane-1, 9β-diol (1) and 2-ethoxyclovane-2β, 9α-diol (3), and one new monoterpene glycoside, p-menthane-1α,2α,8-triol-4-O-β-D-glucoside (5), were obtained, together with eight known compounds from the stems and leaves of I. simonsii. Their structures were elucidated by spectroscopic methods. Compounds 1–11 were evaluated for their potency against Staphylococcus aureus and clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Among them, compound 3 was weakly active against S. aureus (MIC = 128 μg/mL), and compounds 6 and 7 exhibited good antibacterial activity against S. aureus and MRSA (MICs = 2–8 µg/mL). A primary mechanism study revealed that compounds 6 and 7 could kill bacteria by destroying bacterial cell membranes. Moreover, compounds 6 and 7 were not susceptible to drug resistance development.


Introduction
Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most devastating bacterial pathogens that can cause serious infections in both humans and animals [1]. The great challenge in the treatment of S. aureus infections is the appearance of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains, which are not only developing resistance to conventional antibiotics, including β-lactams, macrolides, lincosamides, aminoglycosides and tetracyclines, but are also developing resistance to anti-MRSA antibiotics such as vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin [2][3][4]. There is an urgent need to discover and develop novel antibacterial compounds with therapeutic ability against these drug-resistant bacterial strains.
Illicium simonsii Maxim (Illiciaceae) is an evergreen tree or shrub and is distributed mainly in Southeast Asia [5]. Previous investigations on this plant have revealed that it is a rich source of essential oil, sesquiterpenoids, lignans and C 6 -C 3 compounds [5][6][7].
According to our previous study, triphenyl-sesquineolignans isolated from I. simonsii exhibited good antibacterial activity against S. aureus and MRSA [8,9], which inspired us to further explore and confirm the antibacterial constituents of I. simonsii. In this paper, the isolation and structural elucidation of eleven terpenoids including three new compounds from I. simonsii were reported. In addition, their antibacterial activity was evaluated and the primary mechanism of action of the most active compounds, 6 and 7, was further investigated.

Antimicrobial Activity Test of the I. simonsii Extract
The antimicrobial activity of the ethanol extract of I. simonsii was first determined for S. aureus ATCC 29213, Bacillus. subtilis ATCC 6633 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. The zones of inhibition of 10 µg/disc of I. simonsii ethanol extract were 8.34 mm for S. aureus, 8.34 mm for B. subtilis and 7.70 mm for E. faecalis (Supporting Information). It is evident that the I. simonsii extract might have active compounds responsible for the antimicrobial activity.

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
The antimicrobial activity of compounds 1-11 was tested against both S. aureus (Grampositive) and Escherichia coli (Gram-negative), and their MIC values are shown in Table 3. Compounds 6 and 7 exhibited good antibacterial activity against S. aureus with MIC = 4 and 8 µg/mL, respectively. Compound 3 was weakly active against S. aureus with MIC = 128 µg/mL. However, all compounds did not exhibit any activity against E. coli at tested concentrations lower than 128 µg/mL. The most active compounds, 6 and 7, were further evaluated against 10 clinical MRSA strains using the same method. As shown in Table 4, the range of MIC values of compounds 6 and 7 was 2-8 µg/mL.

Time−Kill Kinetics Assay
The time−kill kinetics assay of compounds 6 and 7 with different concentrations was carried out against MRSA-3. As shown in Figures 2 and 3

Resistance Development Study
The resistance development studies against S. aureus ATCC 29213 showed that compounds 6 and 7 were unsusceptible to drug resistance development even after 20 passages at subinhibitory concentrations (2 μg/mL and 4 μg/mL; 1/2× MIC, respectively), which demonstrated that it was difficult for S. aureus to develop resistance to both compounds, whereas norfloxacin showed an about 64-fold increase in the MIC after 14-16 passages (Figure 4).

Resistance Development Study
The resistance development studies against S. aureus ATCC 29213 showed that compounds 6 and 7 were unsusceptible to drug resistance development even after 20 passages at subinhibitory concentrations (2 µg/mL and 4 µg/mL; 1/2× MIC, respectively), which demonstrated that it was difficult for S. aureus to develop resistance to both compounds, whereas norfloxacin showed an about 64-fold increase in the MIC after 14-16 passages (Figure 4).

Resistance Development Study
The resistance development studies against S. aureus ATCC 29213 showed that compounds 6 and 7 were unsusceptible to drug resistance development even after 20 passages at subinhibitory concentrations (2 μg/mL and 4 μg/mL; 1/2× MIC, respectively), which demonstrated that it was difficult for S. aureus to develop resistance to both compounds, whereas norfloxacin showed an about 64-fold increase in the MIC after 14-16 passages (Figure 4).

SYTOX Green Assay
In order to explore whether the bactericidal effect of active compounds acts directly on the cell membrane, compound 7 was selected to further investigate the mode of antimicrobial action. Experiments of the SYTOX green assay indicated that when an MRSA-3 bacterial suspension was exposed to 1×, 2×, 4× and 8× MIC of compound 7, it increased the SYTOX green fluorescence emission gradually after 8 min (Figure 6a). In addition, when the concentration of compound 7 was 8× MIC, the fluorescence intensity was close to that of the positive control melittin (Figure 6b), while the blank, vancomycin and daptomycin failed to increase the fluorescence intensity under the same conditions. These observations confirmed that compound 7 rapidly disrupted bacterial membranes.

SYTOX Green Assay
In order to explore whether the bactericidal effect of active compounds acts directly on the cell membrane, compound 7 was selected to further investigate the mode of antimicrobial action. Experiments of the SYTOX green assay indicated that when an MRSA-3 bacterial suspension was exposed to 1×, 2×, 4× and 8× MIC of compound 7, it increased the SYTOX green fluorescence emission gradually after 8 min (Figure 6a). In addition, when the concentration of compound 7 was 8× MIC, the fluorescence intensity was close to that of the positive control melittin (Figure 6b), while the blank, vancomycin and daptomycin failed to increase the fluorescence intensity under the same conditions. These observations confirmed that compound 7 rapidly disrupted bacterial membranes. The preliminary toxicity of compounds 6 and 7 toward mammalian cells was evaluated against lyse red blood cells (RBCs). The 50% hemolysis concentration (HC50) of 6 and 7 were approximately 32 μg/mL (8× MIC) and 32 μg/mL (4× MIC), respectively ( Figure 5).

SYTOX Green Assay
In order to explore whether the bactericidal effect of active compounds acts directly on the cell membrane, compound 7 was selected to further investigate the mode of antimicrobial action. Experiments of the SYTOX green assay indicated that when an MRSA-3 bacterial suspension was exposed to 1×, 2×, 4× and 8× MIC of compound 7, it increased the SYTOX green fluorescence emission gradually after 8 min (Figure 6a). In addition, when the concentration of compound 7 was 8× MIC, the fluorescence intensity was close to that of the positive control melittin (Figure 6b), while the blank, vancomycin and daptomycin failed to increase the fluorescence intensity under the same conditions. These observations confirmed that compound 7 rapidly disrupted bacterial membranes.

Visualization of Bacterial Membrane Permeability
The influence of compound 7 on the MRSA-3 bacterial membranes was further visualized using 4 ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and propidium iodide (PI), which are typically used to monitor the changes in bacterial viability [18]. As shown in Figure 7, the negative control without compound 7 only displayed blue fluorescence, indicating the intact cell membranes of MRSA-3, while after treatment with compound 7, blue and red fluorescence was observed, suggesting that the cell membranes of MRSA-3 were disrupted by compound 7.

Visualization of Bacterial Membrane Permeability
The influence of compound 7 on the MRSA-3 bacterial membranes was further visualized using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and propidium iodide (PI), which are typically used to monitor the changes in bacterial viability [18]. As shown in Figure 7, the negative control without compound 7 only displayed blue fluorescence, indicating the intact cell membranes of MRSA-3, while after treatment with compound 7, blue and red fluorescence was observed, suggesting that the cell membranes of MRSA-3 were disrupted by compound 7.

Discussion
Several studies have illustrated that essential oils, terpenes and lignans from Illicium species, such as I. verum, I. griffithii, I. wardii, I. angustisepalum and I. simonsii, have potent antimicrobial activity [19][20][21][22][23]. To explain and confirm the antibacterial activity of I. simonsii, bioassay-guided fractionation of the ethanol extract of I. simonsii resulted in the isolation of three new natural compounds (1, 3 and 5) and eight known compounds (Figure 1), in which compounds 3, 6 and 7 are responsible for the antibacterial activity. The most active compounds (-)-bornyl p-coumarate (6)

Discussion
Several studies have illustrated that essential oils, terpenes and lignans from Illicium species, such as I. verum, I. griffithii, I. wardii, I. angustisepalum and I. simonsii, have potent antimicrobial activity [19][20][21][22][23]. To explain and confirm the antibacterial activity of I. simonsii, bioassay-guided fractionation of the ethanol extract of I. simonsii resulted in the isolation of three new natural compounds (1, 3 and 5) and eight known compounds (Figure 1), in which compounds 3, 6 and 7 are responsible for the antibacterial activity. The most active compounds (-)-bornyl p-coumarate (6) and (-)-bornyl cis-4-hydroxycinnamate (7) showed good activity against S. aureus and MRSA, with MIC values of 2-8 µg/mL. Similar structures exhibiting potent antibacterial activity were reported in previous studies, such as bornyl caffeate, bornyl coumarate [24], bornyl 3 , 4 -dimethoxybenzoate and bornyl 3 , 4 , 5 -tri-methoxybenzoate [25]. The antibacterial activity of compound 7 was slightly weaker than that of compound 6, which may be attributed to the different configuration of double bonds in their structures. It is worth mentioning that (+)-bornyl p-coumarate previously isolated from Piper caninum also exhibited good antibacterial activity with MIC = 2 µM [24]. Perhaps the absolute configuration of their structure had no effect on the antibacterial activity. In order to further study the structure-activity relationship, we purchased the compounds (+)-borneol, (-)-borneol, p-coumaric acid and cis-4-hydroxycinnamic acid from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., and tested their antibacterial activity against S. aureus. However, they did not show activity against S. aureus (MICs > 128 µg/mL). Based on the above research, the esterified products of (±)-borneol and phenolic compounds can effectively improve their antibacterial activity; the position and the number of phenolic hydroxyl groups are closely related to their antibacterial activity [26]. These understandings could be helpful to propose a strategy for the development and rational design of more potent (±)-borneol ester-based antimicrobial derivatives.
In this study, the bacterial time-kill kinetics were assessed using clinical isolate MRSA-3 with vancomycin as the positive control. Compounds 6 and 7 could efficiently achieve a 4-log reduction at 4× MIC and 3× MIC both at the early exponential and stationary phases of cells within 1-2 h, respectively, whereas vancomycin needed more than 8 h to achieve this. The rapid antibacterial features of compounds 6 and 7 seem to indicate that their bactericidal mechanism may be achieved by damaging the bacterial cell membrane [27].
To verify our conjecture, the membrane disruption action of compound 7 against MRSA-3 was investigated by fluorescence probe SYTOX Green and PI, as well as fluorescence imaging technology. As a result, both assays presented the same results, showing that compound 7 could rapidly kill the bacteria by disrupting the cell membranes.
Antibiotic resistance is a highlighted problem that has attracted global attention. Many new and promising antibacterial candidates are being designed for targeting the bacterial cell membrane because of their low-frequency drug resistance and potential to rapidly kill bacteria [28], but their potential cytotoxicity to the host is still a matter of considerable debate [29]. In this case, the HC 50 of compounds 6 and 7 against RBCs was approximately 32 µg/mL, which yielded an initial therapeutic index of 2-8 µg/mL towards MRSA. Despite this, the structural optimization of both compounds to reduce toxicity still needs to be further explored.
In conclusion, our present results detail three new terpenoids and two potent in vitro antibacterial constitutions in the stems and leaves of I. simonsii extract; moreover, compounds 6 and 7 may represent promising natural antibacterial compounds for developing new anti-infectious drugs, although their exact mechanism of action and pharmacological action in vivo remain to be clarified.

Plant Material, Separation and Purification of Compounds 1-11
The stems and leaves of the plant were collected in Dali City, Yunnan Province, China, during August 2015 and identified as Illicium simonsii Hook. f. et Thoms. by Prof. Dequan Zhang (College of Pharmacy, Dali University). A voucher specimen of I. simonsii (2 August 2015) was deposited at the School of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhengzhou University.

Bacterial Strains and Growth Condition
Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. The methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA-1-10) was provided by the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The bacterial strains were stored in a refrigerator at -80 • C. Before the experiment, the experimental strains were thawed and inoculated on a MHA nutrient agar plate. After being cultured overnight at 37 • C, the strain was picked up into 1 mL MHB culture medium, and incubated in a 37 • C shaker at 200 rpm for 3-5 h.

Antimicrobial Activity by K-B Disk Diffusion Test
The antimicrobial activity of the I. simonsii extract was carried out by the disc diffusion method according the literature [30]. Briefly, the test sample was first dissolved with DMSO to obtain a concentration of 1280 µg/mL solution, the inoculums of microorganisms were spread over nutrient agar plates with a sterile swab, and sterilized metrical filter paper discs were soaked with 10 µg/disc concentration of the test samples. Then, the soaked discs were placed on the marked agar plate and dried and inoculated at 37 • C for 16-18 h. Vancomycin was used as a positive control. The diameters of inhibition zones were measured.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Assay
The MIC values of compounds 1-11 were determined by broth micro-dilution in a Mueller-Hinton broth medium (MHB) according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [31]. S. aureus (ATCC 29213), E. coli (ATCC 25922) and clinical MRSA strains (M-1-10) were used in this experiment. Test compounds were dissolved into DMSO, and antibiotic vancomycin was dissolved with sterile Milli-Q water, then these solutions were two-fold serially diluted to a series of gradient concentrations (256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, and 1 µg/mL). The results were determined after incubation for 16-18 h at 37 • C. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the compound that produced complete inhibition of visible growth. All MIC determinations were repeated three times.

Time-Kill Kinetics Assay
A time-kill assay was evaluated according to the guidelines of CLSI [31]. Briefly, an overnight culture of bacterial (MRSA-3) was adjusted in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) medium to obtain a bacterial suspension with 10 5 (early exponential phase) and 10 8 (stationary exponential phase) CFU/mL. Then, MASR-3 was challenged with compound 6 (1×, 2× and 4× MIC), 7 (1×, 2× and 3× MIC) and vancomycin (3× MIC, 4× MIC) at 37 • C and 225 rpm. The aliquots were removed at 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 8 h, serial 10-fold dilutions of the sample were made in the diluent (PBS), and a 10 µL aliquot of each dilution was plated out on MHA plates using the surface-spread plate method. The plates were incubated at 37 • C for 24 h to measure viable plate counts (CFU).

Bacteria Resistance Study
According to the methods used in previous studies [32], the propensity for developing bacterial resistance towards S. aureus (ATCC 29213) of compounds 6, 7 and control antibiotic norfloxacin was investigated. Briefly, the original MICs of compounds 6, 7 and norfloxacin against S. aureus were determined at first. An S. aureus suspension incubated at the exponential phase at 37 • C was passaged to a fresh MHB containing the test compounds at sub-inhibitory concentration (1/2 MIC), the process was repeated every 20 to 22 h for up to 20 passages, and the MICs for test compounds were assayed at every passage as described above.

SYTOX Green Staining Assay
The bacterial suspension of MRSA-3 was incubated at 37 • C for 6 h and suspended in 1× PBS. Then, the bacterial suspension was incubated with 3 µM of SYTOX green for 20 min at room temperature until the fluorescence readings were stable. The final concentrations of added compound 7 were 1/4× MIC, 1/2× MIC, 1× MIC, 2× MIC, 4× MIC, and 8× MIC. The fluorescence reading was monitored for the next 40 min at every 2 min interval at an excitation wavelength of 504 nm and an emission wavelength of 523 nm. Vancomycin and daptomycin were used as negative controls, and melittin was used as a positive control. DMSO (100%, 1%) and water were used as blank controls.

Visualization of Bacterial Membrane Permeability
As described in the literature [34], the bacterial suspension of MRSA-3 was treated with compound 7 at desired concentrations (2× and 4× MIC). After incubation at 37 • C for 3 h, the bacterial suspension was added and stained with 4 , 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI, 10 µg/mL) and propidium iodide (PI, 20 µg/mL) for 30 min at 0 • C. Finally, the suspension was observed by a fluorescence microscope with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm. Bacterial no-treatment with 7 was used as a blank control.